Be sure to check the amount of space you will be given from your host. Some web hosts only offer 1GB of free space, while others offer much more. Especially for free sites, the more space you use, the more limited your account will become until you start paying for it.
Resist the temptation to accept free domain registration from the same company you will be using for web hosting. There are many start-ups out there who may – or may not – be around for very long, and they probably will not give clients advance notice if they are going out of business. You will need to have immediate access to your domain registration if this happens, but may not be able to get it if they are out of business.
When you are choosing a web hosting company, it is important that you rely on more than just one or two pieces of advice on a recommendation. Many recommendations are from people who haven’t even experienced the web hosting company that they are recommending. Choose wisely, do your research, and know many things about the company that you choose.
Choose a web host that charges a low monthly fee. You can usually find a quality web host for between $5 and $10 per month. You may also be able to save money by paying for 12, 18 or 24 months of service at one time, instead of paying for web hosting services on a monthly basis.
Be sure to back up your website and information to your computer as often as you can. Your host may not back up your site so if they experience extensive technical difficulties or are even shut down for good, your site will practically be gone forever and you will have to start anew.
If you want a good website, look for a web hosting service that comes with different features such as a forum, a chat room, a shopping cart or a subscription form for instance. Often, coding this kind of pages or tools is too complicated for someone with limited experience.
To get started with your very first website, consider a free web hosting company. After all, your initial site is the one that will teach you lessons – not make you a ton of profits. You may end up with a lot of downtime, and you’ll have ads that aren’t yours, but you’ll get an intro to running your own site.
When deciding upon a web hosting service, take a close look at the specific plans they offer. Price is not the only factor in deciding a monthly plan; check to see that you understand exactly what you are getting for that fee. Examples of what to look for include the number of sub-domains you are allowed, as well as how many email accounts are allotted to you.
When choosing a web hosting company, you want to go with security over cheaper prices. It is important that not only is all of your information secure, but all of your customers’ information, as well. Select a web hosting company that you know you can trust and that provides secure web hosting.
Always have a backup plan for web hosting providers. In the event that you experience significant and ongoing problems with your hosting service, you will want to have an alternate already researched. If you are without service for more than a day, start immediately putting your backup plan into action. This will save you the potential for even longer delays if your provider has serious problems.
A good web hosting service should bill you professionally. You should be able to log in with a username and password to have access to your account balance and make secured payments. If you have to send PayPal payments every months without getting account statements, you are not dealing with a serious web hosting service.
Never register your domain with your web hosting service. Many people mistakenly do this, and then realize later they can’t transfer their site over to another web hosting service. This can happen when a company goes offline and bust or for other various reasons. Make sure you register your domain with a different company than your web hosting provider.
If you want a web host you can trust, look at the kind of guarantee they offer. Some services offer to refund your money if you decide you are not satisfied. This means these services are very confident about being able to host your website and keep it online constantly.
It is important to determine your needs prior to shopping for a web hosting service. There are numerous packages you can choose from that vary significantly in price. Some of the factors you should consider include the amount of bandwidth you need, how much disk space you require, and the types of databases offered. Knowing your requirements in a web host will make it much easier for you to select a hosting package.
Thinking about using a free web host for your new website? Make sure to back up everything that you want to keep, because free hosts don’t usually provide any sort of backup services (remember — you get what you pay for). As a result, if anything disappears, you’re out of luck.
Make sure the host you choose has minimal to no downtime. It is frustrating if you try to log on to your site, and the server is down. If you have a business that relies on the internet for sales, this means you will lose a lot of money because your site is not operable.
Not only do you need to select a good web hosting company, but you need to select the right package. Usually the more expensive the package, the more bandwidth you receive as well as disk space. Disk space is important because it is where all of your pages and site information is stored. You need a large amount of disk space in order to have an advanced site.
File Shares and SharePoint. Still a Hot Topic.
I’m sometimes reminded that there is still a lot of debate over how to position file shares and SharePoint in an organization. There are still many people drinking the file share Kool-Aid and that’s fine. I blogged about this a little over a year ago and it generated more than 5000 views and 8 comments/trackbacks which is about 8 more than usual. Apparently, Joel has to talk about this a lot as he posted about this again recently. (I would link you there, but his new blog is down again. Somebody please fix this! Joel’s blog is too important to be down. I joked with him when he was putting together his new site that he needed a hot standby failover solution.)
Anyways, after I posted my latest entry on geo-redundancy in SharePoint I’ve been enjoying some great debate through comments with TBA. I thought that conversation would be interesting for the rest of you. Here’s it is:
# re: More Clarification Needed? Geographic Separation of SharePoint Farm Components.
What strikes me is that due to these limitations, SharePoint cannot be easily configured to replace DFS for file storage ! SharePoint is marketed as the “file server of the future” yet it lacks the DFS’s feature of maintaining local copies of files in environments that span continents/remote locations.
If I am to store all my files in SharePoint I have to store them all in one primary data center. Obviously users from different continents are better off having the data locally…. I would think this will be the major upgrade to the next SharePoint…
Monday, April 07, 2008 12:41 PM by TBA
# re: More Clarification Needed? Geographic Separation of SharePoint Farm Components.
SharePoint and file shares co-exist, not replace one another. Each have their own merits. SharePoint makes traditional file share data usable. DFS is one of the few technologies that allow multi-master replication. You are right that users prefer data to be local for performance reasons. However, http traffic is much better than CIFS over the WAN and SharePoint supports numerous acceleration vendors to make consolidated deployments seem local.
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikewat/archive/2006/12/09/file-shares-vs-sharepoint.aspx
Monday, April 07, 2008 12:52 PM by Michael Watson
# re: More Clarification Needed? Geographic Separation of SharePoint Farm Components.
You say “SharePoint makes traditional share data usable”. Ok, I have 250 Gigs of project “Delta” files located on a file share that is DFS replicated for fault-toleration and localization. I have people using that data from all-over the world. Due to SharePoint’s architectural limitation ( lack of file replication support ) I can’t migrate out of DFS.
Right, I have created a team-space in SharePoint called “Delta” – great – the team members now can use discussions / calendars / etc. However the 250 Gigs of related-files are still in DFS and people cannot use Sharepoint’t s doc management features due to this. The only way around this would be to ask people move files between SharePoint ans DFS which is silly and is up to them really – leaving you out of control.
So how exactly is SharePoint making my data usable , again ?
Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:46 AM by TBA
# re: More Clarification Needed? Geographic Separation of SharePoint Farm Components.
Tagged: apparently, blogged, comments, debate, drinking, file, fine, generated, joel, kool, little, organization, over, people, position, posted, recently, reminded, share, sharepoint, sometimes, topic, trackbacks, views, yearThanks for the great debate. It brings the blog to life.
Your file share data in SharePoint becomes “usable” because of the rich metadata definition, context, and most importantly, search. File Share data exists in its raw form without much context. It becomes an island, unknown outside of its most ardent users. It will most likely be duplicated by others since they are unaware it exists.
To improve upon the file share experience while still enjoying its benefits, you could link to the existing data in DFS from SharePoint or simply index the content for search. However, most organizations will prefer to simply migrate the collaboration-ready data to SharePoint. Since data usually has a preferred location it should be moved to the nearest regional SharePoint farm. This ensures the primary users of that data enjoy great performance while still providing access to users outside of the region. If the scenarios truly require it, consider using network acceleration technologies for remote collaborators or one of the SharePoint data replication solutions. We have a lot of great partners in this space and the solutions are probably much cheaper than most realize.
The bottom-line is SharePoint is part of a robust information architecture that improves upon the traditional file share experience with rich metadata, better context, and consolidated and scoped search. While there are certain scenarios were file shares are still the a great solution I’m confident that an organization will be best served by moving the majority of its collaboration to SharePoint.
Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:43 PM by Michael Watson…(read more)
Read More